A new way to think about collectivism (and measure it!)
We argue that many people (even researchers!) have two conflicting intuitions about what collectivism is.
Version 1: One is "warm fuzzy" collectivism--being nice and positive to people in general. People in individualistic, Western cultures tend to agree with warm fuzzy survey questions.
Version 2: The other is what we call "responsibilism," which emphasizes duties in close relationships, but wariness of distant people. People in collectivistic, non-Western cultures tend to agree with responsibilistic items.
The Problem: Many attempts to measure collectivism combined these two versions of collectivism. That led to confusing result, like the US scoring higher than Japan.
The Solution: Measure the right concept! We created a responsibilism scale to do just that. And we gave it to over 12,000 people in 100 cultures around the world from Greenland to Madagascar.
12,247 Participants
45 Languages
100 Cultures
108 Researchers
Responsibilism scores for 100 cultures
Download: Responsibilism Culture Scores.xlsx
Citation: Talhelm, T., Wei, L., Sun, R., Medvedev, D., San Martin, A., Helmy, M., Samekin, A., Zaragoza Scherman, A., English, A. S., & The Responsibilism Collaboration Team. (2026). Defining collectivism as duties in relationships rather than generalized warmth improves predictive validity in 100 cultures. Nature Human Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-026-02525-1